Userflix vs Ethnographies
| Feature | | Ethnographies |
|---|---|---|
| Research Duration | Days to weeks | Months to years |
| Cost per Participant | Low ($10-50) | Very high ($10,000-100,000+ per study) |
| Fieldwork Required | No | Yes |
| Researcher Presence | AI-powered, remote | Physical presence required |
| Contextual Understanding | High (1:1 reflective voice interviews) | Very high |
| Observational Access | Moderate (self-reported behavior + context) | High |
| Setup and Logistics | Simple (fully digital) | Complex |
| Time to Insight | 2-4 days | Weeks to months |
| Sample Size | Flexible (10 to 1000+) | Small (3-10 typical) |
| Emotional Depth | High | High |
Research Duration
Days to weeks
Ethnographies
Months to years
Cost per Participant
Low ($10-50)
Ethnographies
Very high ($10,000-100,000+ per study)
Fieldwork Required
No
Ethnographies
Yes
Researcher Presence
AI-powered, remote
Ethnographies
Physical presence required
Contextual Understanding
High (1:1 reflective voice interviews)
Ethnographies
Very high
Observational Access
Moderate (self-reported behavior + context)
Ethnographies
High
Setup and Logistics
Simple (fully digital)
Ethnographies
Complex
Time to Insight
2-4 days
Ethnographies
Weeks to months
Sample Size
Flexible (10 to 1000+)
Ethnographies
Small (3-10 typical)
Emotional Depth
High
Ethnographies
High
Key benefits of Userflix
Get insights in days to weeks, not months
Understand digital behaviors and contexts remotely
Scale research across multiple locations simultaneously
Multilingual and culturally-aware interviews
Low participant burden with 30-60 minute sessions
Real-time insights without extended fieldwork
When to use Userflix instead of Ethnographies
- You need insights faster than months of fieldwork allow
- Budget constraints make extended fieldwork impractical
- You want to understand digital behaviors and contexts remotely
- You need to reach participants across multiple locations simultaneously
- You want to scale research beyond what's feasible with field researchers
Userflix works well when you need the contextual depth of ethnographic research but require speed, scale, and cost-efficiency. It's well-suited for understanding digital behaviors and user contexts without the time and cost of extended fieldwork.
Ready to capture context at scale?
Get ethnographic depth without fieldwork